"The Two Towers"
by
"Michael Stone"
Having seen "The Fellowship of the Rings"
several times over the last year and watched the expanded cut twice in
the last few weeks, I was a little surprised at how different "The
Two Towers" feels from the first film. The tone of TTT is markedly
different. The first film set up the characters and gave us an introduction
to a fantastic realm of non-human creatures. "The Two Towers"
though spends most of its time in the more familiar world of men and the
dangerous forces gathering against them. It's a grimmer, darker movie
that left me a little sad for the last movie, but then I guess I'm not
feeling anything the characters in the movie don't feel, which may be
the subtlest achievement of the film.
"The Two Towers" covers a lot of ground, not always cleanly
and clearly, because of the problems associated with telling three parallel
stories and assorted small subplots. The tone of the movie is markedly
different from the first and Jackson has to introduce the new characters
here mostly in a hurry. Although we catch brief glimpses of some of the
settings and characters from before, most of the second film takes place
in the world of men, and with the exception of Treebeard and Gollum, all
the new characters are from the human kingdoms adjacent to Mordor who
have fought the rising tide of evil from it for some time now. At three
hours the movie is a little choppy in spots, and it's even missing bits
and pieces already shown in the trailers and the film books, but it barely
matters because what's on the screen is so visually compelling. "Towers"
extends the amazing computer imagery from the first film not only into
creating amazing settings and action, but into believable characters.
Treebeard, an ancient giant walking tree, is amazing enough on his own,
but the real breakthrough is Gollum. Yes, he still looks like a computer
animated creature, but part of that is our knowledge that no one like
that could be real. Make allowances for that, and you find Gollum inhabits
the same space as Sean Astin and Elijah Woods as a real actor. Plus, Gollum
is no easy character to get "right" as a schizophenric, goggle-eyed
wretch both pathetic and dangerous. It helped that Gollum was acted by
Andy Sirkis ( who provides the voice ) onstage with Astin and Woods then
replaced with his computer alter-ego, but it still couldn't bring the
character to visual life and reality unless the science and art were there.
Peter Jackson's WETA group has really pioneered a great, if not greater,
leap in special effects than ILM.
000200000C1B00000A30 C15, If I do have any quibbles about the film, other
than having to wait a year for the end film and nearly two years for the
complete expanded version, it's missing many of the characters from the
first film. "Fellowship" immersed us in such magical realms
as the worlds of the elves and dwarfs that the world of men looks a little
prosaic. Hugo Weaving, Liv Tyler, and Cate Blanchet all make cameo appearances,
but I still missed them nonetheless. Both Ian McKellan and Christopher
Lee both have little screen time here as well. Instead, we get new characters
such as the aged King Theoden ( Bernard Hill ), his duplicitous "adviser",
Grima Wormtongue ( Brad Dourif ), Theoden's daughter Eowyn ( Miranda Otto
) and son Eomer ( Karl Urban ). Dourif is easily the most fun, providing
a new screen standard in loathsomeness, while Bernard Hill gives a magisterial
performance as the old king who knows he must rouse himself and his people
for one last battle, despite the overwhelming odds that they will lose.
Otto looks good at looking good, although her character has the unhappy
count against her of essentially being a woman trying to woo Aragorn from
his elf love. Of the returning main characters, the lighthearted mood
of the first film is gone and everyone gets to be little more than grim
for three hours, which they all do well even if it is a little hard to
watch three hours of it.
Despite even if it is a little hard to
watch three hours of it.
Despite some minor quibbles though, "The Two Towers" is the
best movie of 2002; visually breathtaking ( it's too bad you don't have
a "Best Landscape" Oscar - New Zealand would win in a walk ),
epic in scope and scale, and flawlessly acted. The Academy, half-assed
jerkoffs that they tend to be, is likely to screw it out of Best Picture
again and give it to some navel-gazing piece of self-important lint, but
we know what people will be watching long after "The Road to Perdition"
and "About Schmidt" are forgotten...
|